Aziz Dougaz vs Philip Henning Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the past six months, Dougaz has demonstrated a stronger second serve performance compared to Henning, securing 46.11% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Henning has managed 39.75% in the same category. The performance during return games also highlights Dougaz's slight advantage, as they have won 42.81% of their opponent's second serve points. Henning, on the other hand, has secured 41.73% in the same aspect. When it comes to returns on first serves, both players are nearly equal, with Dougaz achieving 26.17% and Henning slightly ahead at 26.21%.

When evaluated under pressure, the analysis indicates that Dougaz has been successful in saving 60.83% of breakpoints, whereas Henning has managed to save 51.7%. In terms of match results over the last year, Henning has outperformed Dougaz, with a winning percentage of 71.88% (46 wins and 18 losses), compared to Dougaz's 57.14% (48 wins and 36 losses), offering a broader perspective on their overall capabilities.

Looking at the best surface performances, Dougaz favors Hard courts, securing a 61% win rate, while experiencing less success on Grass with a 0% win rate. Henning also shows a preference for Hard courts, where they have an impressive win rate of 81%, but has a lower win rate on Indoor Hard courts at 56%. At the career level, Dougaz has faced opponents with a higher average rank of 324.45 compared to Henning, who has faced opponents averaging a rank of 387.52 over the past year.

Delving into the tournaments attended, Dougaz has participated mainly in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with a 51.43% win rate. Meanwhile, Henning has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, achieving an 87.5% win rate. If the match extends into a deciding set, Dougaz holds a slight advantage, having won 45% of such sets over the past year, while Henning has won 44% under similar conditions.

Current stats from ongoing events can impact the analysis further, but historical performance is crucial. For breakpoint conversion, Henning has the upper hand, converting 34.23% of opportunities, while Dougaz has converted 27.84%. Taking these factors into account, Henning's superior overall record and consistent performance metrics suggest they are more likely to win the upcoming match.